Poverty in economic criteria

     

Poverty in economic criteria

Paul Krugman has been an Opinion Scholar since 2000 and is also a Distinguished Professor at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York.

He won the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences in 2008 for his work on international trade and economic geography, but in addition to all this, without realizing it, Paul has been an experiment in the influence of democrats in the universe, from time to time it is necessary to pay a sector with force, and I say this because at that time the mojo was paid for that logarithm, which those of the digital algorithm drove them crazy to understand.

Krugman was the great solution to not contemplate the current storm clouds.

Today Paul in the New York Times article brings out a political lifesaver, in reality he never did his economic essays well, but now I observe that even to a lesser extent the political mediocrities,... Now he tries to stigmatize the capital of big businessmen in the classic article of circus…. whether the animal turns to the right or to the left, the truth is that trying to figure out an "awarded more than awarded" in his incredible task of positioning the money, to come out heads or tails, is totally ridiculous, when he does not let to live off that interest.

So if they turn to the right, much better Paul, there will be work and everyone is going to get rich, of course it is on the assumption that we will work, now if we live from laziness, even arriving like you to endorse it, everything goes to hell.

Paul, you are old, your criteria are from the last century... you are deluded and you are no longer influential, he discreetly leaves that direction and saves your merits, in case you ever truly achieved them.

You don't realize it but your interest only gives gray hair

A poor man tells you that you still haven't reached your misery.